Husqvarna vs Stihl Leaf Blower: An In-Depth Comparison Guide

When choosing between a Husqvarna and an STIHL leaf blower, the performance differences can significantly affect your yardwork efficiency. After hands-on testing of both brands, I’ve found some clear distinctions worth noting. The Husqvarna 125B delivers slightly better airflow with 425 CFM compared to the STIHL BG 56 C-E’s 412 CFM. Additionally, Husqvarna edges ahead with an airspeed of 170 MPH, compared to STIHL’s 159 MPH.

However, the comparison between Stihl vs Husqvarna backpack blowers reveals more than just numbers. I’ve noticed that the Husqvarna 580 features a side handle design, which many users find more comfortable than the top-mounted handle on Stihl models. The tube size difference between these brands is also quite substantial. If you’re debating between a Husqvarna vs Stihl backpack blower, you’ll also want to consider that Stihl offers a larger fuel tank capacity at 18.3 fl oz., potentially allowing for longer operation between refills.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll examine everything from power specifications to comfort features, helping you decide which brand deserves a spot in your garden shed. Whether you’re a weekend warrior or a landscaping professional, understanding these differences will ensure you make the right investment for your specific needs.

Power and Airflow Performance

The raw power of a leaf blower determines how efficiently you can clear debris from your yard. Diving into the performance metrics reveals some interesting differences between these two popular brands.

CFM Output: 425 vs 412 CFM

Cubic Feet per Minute (CFM) measures the volume of air a blower pushes out—essentially how much material it can move at once. In this critical metric, the Husqvarna 125B delivers a slightly higher rating at 425 CFM compared to the STIHL BG 56 C-E’s 412 CFM. This small difference of 13 CFM gives the Husqvarna a minor edge when clearing larger piles of leaves or covering wider areas in fewer passes.

The higher CFM rating contributes to Husqvarna’s effectiveness in moving substantial amounts of leaves, particularly when dealing with wet debris that requires a higher air volume to lift and move.

Air Speed: 170 MPH vs 159 MPH

Air speed, measured in Miles Per Hour (MPH), indicates how fast the air exits the blower tube—a crucial factor for dislodging stubborn debris. Once again, the Husqvarna 125B outperforms the STIHL BG 56 C-E, with 170 MPH versus 159 MPH. This 11 MPH advantage makes the Husqvarna particularly effective at lifting wet leaves from grass surfaces or moving heavier garden debris that might resist airflow at lower velocities.

Furthermore, this speed difference becomes notably apparent when dealing with stuck-on debris or when working in tight spaces where precision matters more than volume.

Blowing Force: 12.5 Newtons vs 13 Newtons

While CFM and MPH are commonly cited specs, blowing force measured in Newtons provides the most accurate performance indicator. Newton’s ratings combine both air speed and volume into a single measurement of force. Interestingly, despite Husqvarna’s advantages in the previous metrics, the Stihl BG 50 delivers a slightly stronger blowing force at 13.0 Newtons compared to Husqvarna’s 12.5 Newtons.

This higher Newton rating explains why, despite lower CFM and MPH numbers, Stihl blowers still perform exceptionally well in real-world testing. The focused air stream creates greater impact force, making Stihl particularly effective for precision work like clearing tight corners or persistent debris.

Understanding these performance metrics reveals that neither brand completely dominates. The Husqvarna excels in raw air volume and speed, whereas Stihl delivers slightly more focused blowing force—each offering distinct advantages depending on your specific yard maintenance needs.

Engine and Fuel Efficiency

Engine and Fuel Efficiency

Engine capability often determines a leaf blower’s overall performance in the field. Looking at the specifications reveals meaningful distinctions between these two brands.

Engine Displacement: 28cc vs 27.2cc

The Husqvarna 125B features a slightly larger 28cc engine displacement than the 27.2cc found in STIHL models. This marginal difference suggests the Husqvarna may consume a bit more fuel per stroke but could deliver additional power output as a result. For those considering a Husqvarna vs. an STIHL leaf blower, this small-displacement advantage might translate into better performance in challenging conditions.

Fuel Tank Capacity: 16.9 oz vs 18.3 oz

Conversely, the Stihl BG 56 C-E offers a more generous 18.3 fl oz fuel tank capacity versus the Husqvarna’s 16.9 fl oz. This represents a notable difference for those weighing Stihl vs Husqvarna blower options. The extra fuel capacity could prove valuable during extended cleanup sessions.

Runtime Expectations Based on Tank Size

Given these specifications, the Stihl or Husqvarna leaf blower runtime comparison becomes interesting. Although Husqvarna’s engine might consume marginally more fuel due to its larger displacement, Stihl’s bigger tank potentially allows for longer operation between refills. Yet, actual runtime depends on throttle usage patterns and engine efficiency. For professionals requiring maximum uptime, this balance between tank size and engine efficiency becomes a crucial consideration.

Comfort and Handling

Beyond raw power, ergonomics are crucial in the Husqvarna vs STIHL leaf blower debate. Comfort features determine how long you can work before fatigue sets in.

Weight Comparison: 9.4 lbs vs 9.3 lbs

The weight difference between these models is barely noticeable – Husqvarna 125B at 9.4 lbs versus Stihl at 9.3 lbs. Indeed, both options feel nearly identical over extended use.

Noise Levels: 94 dB vs 70 dB

In contrast, their sound profiles differ dramatically. The Husqvarna emits 94 dB, considerably louder than Stihl’s 70 dB. Consequently, Stihl provides a substantially quieter experience, reducing both operator fatigue and neighbourhood disturbance.

Vibration and Gyroscopic Effect

Stihl excels with its advanced anti-vibration system that decouples the handles from the drivetrain. Moreover, this technology reduces engine vibrations, enabling low-fatigue work even during extended periods.

Cruise Control Availability

Both STIHL and Husqvarna blower models feature cruise control, which is especially valuable during lengthy cleanup sessions, eliminating the need to hold the trigger down continuously.

Grip and Handle Design Differences

Regarding ergonomics, Husqvarna features a side-mounted handle design that many users prefer over Stihl’s top-mounted configuration. Likewise, Husqvarna offers an adjustable handle for a customized fit, whereas STIHL compensates with its soft-grip handle design for extended comfort.

Ease of Use and Maintenance

For many users, the ease of starting and maintaining a leaf blower can be just as important as raw power. The Husqvarna vs STIHL leaf blower comparison reveals key differences in daily operation.

Starting Mechanism: Manual vs Easy Pull

In terms of ease of use, the Stihl generally offers a more user-friendly experience. While Husqvarna features “a kind of easy start” with a moderately easy pull, STIHL provides an even easier pull that’s gentler on your arms and body. This difference becomes apparent after multiple starts throughout a workday.

Choke System: Manual vs Auto Reset

The choke systems differ significantly between these brands. Husqvarna utilizes a manual blue lever that requires the operator to move it through multiple positions (choke, half-choke, run). Meanwhile, Stihl incorporates an automatic choke reset—once the engine fires, simply hitting the trigger automatically shuts off the choke. This auto-reset feature undoubtedly makes STIHL more straightforward for beginners.

Air Filter Access and Design

Regarding air filter maintenance, each STIHL vs. Husqvarna backpack blower has its own approach. Husqvarna employs a felt filter with a soft, rubbery seal. Stihl, alternatively, features a tighter-fitting filter with superior rubber sealing, which generally provides better protection against dust infiltration.

Fuel Cap Design and Refuelling Ease

The fuel cap design on STIHL models hangs better out of the way during refuelling. Additionally, Stihl offers a larger fuel opening, reducing the risk of spills during refuelling. Husqvarna’s hard plastic retainer can sometimes interfere with the pouring process, making refuelling slightly more cumbersome.

Comparison Table

Feature	Husqvarna	Stihl
Performance Specs
Air Flow (CFM)	425	412
Air Speed (MPH)	170	159
Blowing Force (Newtons)	12.5	13.0
Engine & Fuel
Engine Displacement	28cc	27.2cc
Fuel Tank Capacity	16.9 fl.oz	18.3 fl.oz
Physical Attributes
Weight	9.4 lbs	9.3 lbs
Noise Level	94 dB	70 dB
Handle Design	Side-mounted	Top-mounted
Usability Features
Cruise Control	Available	Available
Starting System	Manual pull	Easy pull system
Choke System	Manual blue lever	Auto reset
Maintenance
Air Filter Design	Felt filter with soft plastic seal	Tighter-fitting filter with rubber seal
Fuel Cap Design	Hard plastic retainer	Hanging design with larger opening

Conclusion

After thorough testing and comparison of both brands, the choice between Husqvarna and STIHL leaf blowers ultimately depends on your specific needs. Husqvarna clearly excels in raw power metrics with higher CFM output and air speed, making it particularly effective for moving large volumes of leaves and wet debris. Stihl, however, compensates with slightly better blowing force, creating a more focused stream that works well for precision tasks.

The comfort differences become more pronounced over extended use. Stihl offers a substantially quieter operation at just 70 dB compared to Husqvarna’s 94 dB. This difference alone might sway your decision if you work in noise-sensitive neighbourhoods or value your hearing health. Additionally, STIHL’s superior anti-vibration system reduces fatigue during lengthy yard cleanup sessions.

Practicality matters just as much as power. Stihl wins points with its easier starting mechanism, auto-reset choke system, and better air filter design. These features combine to create a more user-friendly experience, especially for occasional users or those who might struggle with manual starting procedures. The larger fuel tank on STIHL models also means fewer interruptions to refuel during big jobs.

Both brands have earned their reputation through years of reliable performance. Weekend homeowners might appreciate Stihl’s quieter operation and ease of use, while professionals tackling large properties could benefit from Husqvarna’s slight edge in raw airflow. Your decision should factor in your property size, the typical debris you handle, and how frequently you’ll use the equipment.